Mick79

I understand the intention behind simplifying the editor and I also believe that removing HTML functionality for admins limits flexibility and creativity in managing content. Many of us rely on custom HTML for advanced styling and features that are essential to our sites. Though editor extensions can help, they add complexity that the raw HTML editor avoided. Allowing experienced admins the option to use HTML would balance both usability and customisation without compromising the platform's integrity. It would be great to see a compromise that accommodates these needs - but if Tiptap does not support it, I guess there is no way around it.

It’s part of my affiliate advertising. Clickless banners with HTML code from the affiliate are inserted into the post, so that the cookie is set for an impression when somebody views it. It’s not the end of the world, but it does effect my ability to monetise my site, so I plan to stick with v4 for as long as I can.

I have promotional topics that I use the HTML editor to display clickless tracking banners. This is another reduction of functionality that I’d rather not see happen.

Thanks, I have just done this. While I understand the intention behind it, I think removing it as an option is a bit short-sighted. I’ll go to that thread and contribute there, cheers.

Thanks. This one is going to be a BIG problem for my community - as many of them registered with burner emails: Invision CommunityDisplay Name for LoginThe ability to use a display name as a log in is deprecated and will be removed. Using an email address as part of the log in process is more secure than using a publicly visible display name.Can this not remain as an option that admins get to determine?

Hi, Is there a list of breaking changes anywhere? If there are breaking changes, that is. I’m trying to get a sense of how much I will have to re-do for v5. I’ve modified some of the template files for custom purposes, as well as a few custom blocks (JavaScript) and styles. Thanks!